PIERCED FORUM - body piercings, tattoo, body modification

From now on her codename is : ortsA arilA

Call me paranoid but I dont wan't these links to be found through google or any other search engine.
Here's an example to show you what I mean:
http://www.google.com/search?q=female+t ... dforum.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

So please DO NOT mention the SITENAME or the GIRLS NAME(S) unless encrypted
Encrypt names by reversing or using numbers instead of letters like:
a=4 e=3 i=1 o=0 (zero) s=5 and so on. The name in this case for example would be: 4l1ra 45tr0

Anyway, this is an archive of 354 pics @ 1600x2400, 87MB in total.

Here is just one preview of the 354 :



The link:
rapidshare.com/files/251526547/01.rar
The password:
QWxpcmFBc3Rybw

Thanks! Do you have the newer pics of ... "66/enin ytenin", so to speak?

well, let's see:
huge download, 87 mb; the same pictures are repeated numerous times (why?); the neck - tattoo is great; she is covering her nipples with her fingers in some of the pic's; she is getting a little long in the tooth ( "older"); she is still one of the greatest looking gals in the scene; ....
the post may be better placed in the links section
please explain the need for secrecy
thanks for the great post
fishgutt

Easy to find makes it easy for the content creators to hunt the files down and request takedown, to which most file hostings comply. That's about the secrecy.

As for the same images repeated many times: that's how the unmentionable site owner does it. Each gallery is like 500 images long. If you remove duplicates, there may be 2 or 3 different pictures: the rest are nearly identical.

svofski wrote:Easy to find makes it easy for the content creators to hunt the files down and request takedown, to which most file hostings comply. That's about the secrecy.

That is indeed my main concern svofski. Seems like my post started a discussion on this topic here:
http://www.piercedforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=3594" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

svofski wrote:As for the same images repeated many times: that's how the unmentionable site owner does it. Each gallery is like 500 images long. If you remove duplicates, there may be 2 or 3 different pictures: the rest are nearly identical.

Also agree on this one. But since it's the complete series all pics are in one archive just for the sake of being complete

fishgutt99 wrote:....the post may be better placed in the links section....
fishgutt

I didn't even know about that section until you pointed it out just now. But that would mean that large amount of specific themed content would end up on a hodgepodge board...

Dead link dude... can you fix it.. i will love to see alira videos thanks