Page 1 of 1

Question follow up related to the answers.

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 12:57 pm
by doman042
Do you want posts as jpg's, so you see them on the screen, because I made of each map an rar zip-file.
I see the number of hits and the numbers of download are different and the downloads are low.
They all must be virus-free, because I am protecting myself and my up-loads.
So you can mis a lot of fun from the girls I up-loaded.

Kirsten files are from the former group INTIMPIERCING4 from MASTER666, so the credits are for him.

The other files are from Heidi the German girl wich I collected from the internet.

Have fun!

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 6:11 pm
by bdplvr
Jpgs would probably be better. I myself don't have a program that will open the other yet.

JPG

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 3:44 pm
by igel642
JPGs are quicker to handle :wink:

Questio follow up.

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 6:29 pm
by doman042
Do you like the new method?
Jpg and a RAR file for quick downloads?

Or shall I delete the RAR files?

Hope to hear/read your answers.

jpg vs rar

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 8:46 pm
by mXa
Perhaps a jpg as introduction
and then bulk in rar?
We can download expand if
jpg is of interest.
mXa

Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:40 am
by artatpt
I prefer jps's